A unicentric center, multicenter, and mixed-type Castleman disease: Three case reports and a review of the literature.

RATIONALE: Due to the lack of specificity symptoms and site of onset of castleman disease (CD), it is difficult to diagnose and poses unique challenges for both patients and clinicians, leading to confusion in diagnosis and delays in treatment. To enhance understanding, we present 3 cases of CD treated at our hospital, including a single-center, multicenter, and mixed-type CD. PATIENT CONCERNS: Case 1: A 53-year-old female patient was admitted with a chief complaint of "abdominal pain and fever for 10 days." Marked enlargement of inguinal lymph nodes on both sides was observed. Case 2: A 58-year-old female patient was admitted with the main complaint of "discovering a left lower abdominal mass during a routine checkup for the past 10 days." Upon deep palpation, a palpable mass of approximately 5.0 * 3.0 cm was identified in the left lower abdomen. Case 3: A 40-year-old male patient was admitted with the main complaint of "progressive right upper abdominal and lumbar back pain for over 6 months." Computed tomography examination revealed multiple nodular soft tissue masses between the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava, with the largest measuring 5.0 * 4.0 cm. DIAGNOSES: Based on the immunohistochemical results, the diagnoses for the 3 patients are as follows: Case 1: Multicentric Castleman's Disease (Mixed Type). Case 2: Pelvic Retroperitoneal Castleman Disease (Hyaline Vascular Type). Case 3: Castleman Disease Multicentric Type. INTERVENTION: Case 1: cyclophosphamide 0.6-1 g + vincristine 2 mg + methylprednisolone 50 mg/5 days. Cyclophosphamide 1 g + prednisone 30-50 mg/5 days. This alternating chemotherapy cycle is repeated every 6 months. Case 2: Laparoscopic pelvic mass excision surgery. Case 3: Surgical excision of the mass. OUTCOMES: Case 1: After a 43-month follow-up, the patient's general symptoms have improved compared to before, but regular chemotherapy is still necessary at present. Case 2: The patient did not take any medication postoperatively, and there has been no evidence of metastasis or recurrence during the 18-month follow-up. Case 3: The patient did not take any medication, and there has been no evidence of metastasis or recurrence during the 21-month follow-up. LESSONS SUBSECTIONS: The lack of specific signs on imaging studies and nonspecific blood tests increases the difficulty of diagnosis. However, tissue biopsy remains a feasible option. Therefore, we recommend conducting thorough examinations for suspected CD patients to reduce misdiagnosis and determine the CD type for effective targeted treatment.

Precise Capture and Dynamic Release of Circulating Liver Cancer Cells with Dual-histidine-based Cell Imprinted Hydrogels.

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) detection presents significant advantages in diagnosing liver cancer due to its non-invasiveness, real-time monitoring, and dynamic tracking. However, the clinical application of CTCs-based diagnosis is largely limited by the challenges of capturing low-abundance CTCs within a complex blood environment while ensuring them alive. Here we design an ultra-strong ligand, L-histidine-L-histidine (HH), specifically targeting sialylated glycans on the surface of CTCs. Further HH is integrated into a cell-imprinted polymer, constructing a hydrogel with precise CTCs imprinting, high elasticity, satisfactory blood-compatibility, and robust anti-interference capacities. These features endow the hydrogel with excellent capture efficiency (>95%) for CTCs in peripheral blood, as well as the ability to release CTCs controllably and alive. Clinical tests substantiate the accurate differentiation between liver cancer, cirrhosis, and healthy groups using this method. The remarkable diagnostic accuracy (94%), lossless release of CTCs, material reversibility, and cost-effectiveness (6.68 dollars per sample) make the HH-based hydrogel a potentially revolutionary technology for liver cancer diagnosis and single-cell analysis. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

The potential applications of artificially modified exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells in tumor therapy.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have tumor-homing ability and play critical roles in tumor treatment, but their dual influences on tumor progression limit their therapeutic applications. Exosomes derived from MSCs (MSC-exosomes) exhibit great potential in targeted tumor treatment due to their advantages of high stability, low immunogenicity, good biocompatibility, long circulation time and homing characteristics. Furthermore, the artificial modification of MSC-exosomes could amplify their advantages and their inhibitory effect on tumors and could overcome the limit of tumor-promoting effect. In this review, we summarize the latest therapeutic strategies involving artificially modified MSC-exosomes in tumor treatment, including employing these exosomes as nanomaterials to carry noncoding RNAs or their inhibitors and anticancer drugs, and genetic engineering modification of MSC-exosomes. We also discuss the feasibility of utilizing artificially modified MSC-exosomes as an emerging cell-free method for tumor treatment and related challenges.